Warrior-Class
The Warrior-class of broadside ironclad were the first armour-plated, iron-hulled warships ever built and were built in response to the Marine Nationale’s launching in 1859 of the world’s first ocean-going ironclad warship, the Gloire. However, the history of this Anglo-French arms race goes back a little further, beginning with France’s launching of the steam-powered ship-of-the-line Napoléon in 1850. This was a pivotal moment in the history of shipbuilding as it marked the turning point in the age of sail that had dominated the industry for millennia. Warships would continue to be built with sails for a few decades more but henceforth, steam power was entering its golden age. Not only was it paramount that the Royal Navy kept pace with the Marine Nationale and remain at the forefront of naval development the world over, but examples also overseas during the Crimean War (1853-1856) showcased just how vulnerable traditional wooden-hulled and armoured warships were against the newest guns and iron-armoured warships. When France then launched the Gloire in 1859, it tipped the balance of naval power in France’s favour. The British were spooked and immediately became nervous about a possible invasion, not least because the French monarch, Napoleon III, was looking to increase French power and prestige and reassert their influence across Europe. Having a fleet of state-of-the-art ironclads could allow the ambitious ruler to do just that.
The situation was deemed so serious that Queen Victoria herself asked the Admiralty if the Royal Navy was capable of performing the tasks necessary in wartime. Thus, a response to the French threat was warranted. The task of designing a suitable vessel was given to the Chief Constructor of the Navy, Isaac Watts, and the Chief Engineer Thomas Lloyd. The Warrior class were designed around a typical wooden frigate of the era, in this case, HMS Mersey and featured an armoured box (or citadel) along the amidships gun deck, which protected most of the ship’s guns. This design was later referred to as a “broadside ironclad” when compared to other later ironclads but was at the time regarded as an “armoured frigate”. It was decided to build the ship with an iron hull, unlike the French Gloire as this was regarded as the best trade-off between speed and protection and compared favourably with ironclad wooden warships like the Gloire.
The Warrior-class were less an innovation of current thinking and more a blend of all the modern trends of shipbuilding into one. Steam propulsion had been used for a decade in warship design and was employed again and she was far from the first iron-hulled ship of any kind built. However, her wrought iron armour was a notable advantage, to such an extent that upon her launch she obsoleted all other warships in the world. She was faster and more heavily armoured than anything else afloat. She was so revelatory that all construction of wooden ships-of-the-line was halted immediately and instead the construction of a further dozen ironclads ordered in their stead. The most fundamental difference in design between the Gloire and the Warrior class was in their intended role. The French ship was designed to replace ships-of-the-line in the line of battle, whereas the British vessels were intended as supporting ships and weren’t expected to survive under concentrated fire from wooden triple-decked warships in confrontation. They were expected to use their speed to dictate the range of engagement and their strong armour to protect them from faster vessels. However, it was clear from the beginning that these ships would be far superior to anything else they’d likely face in battle, at least for the time being.
Both ships were laid down in 1859 and construction was rapid, although not without difficulty. Indeed, due to several Admiralty procrastinations, the builders of HMS Warrior nearly went bankrupt and had to be bailed out to the sum of £50,000 to keep them afloat. When Warrior was launched on 29th December 1860, it was during a record-breaking cold winter, and she had to be rocked free from her slipway as she was completely frozen. It took the combined efforts of hydraulic rams, tugs, and dockworkers running along her upper deck from side to side to help break her free. The total cost of the two ships was almost double two equivalent wooden ships of the line. Some of the delays discussed earlier were due to frequent Admiralty design changes to the ships, including the modification of the gun ports to allow for greater arcs of fire for the artillery. A further change was the adjustment of the armour plating with tongue and groove joints to better lock the plating together and improve their resistance to armour-piercing shells. These modifications delayed the completion of the ships for a year past their contractual date.
The Warrior-class ships were 128.0 metres long, 17.78 metres in breadth and had a draught of 7.92 metres. They displaced between 9,284 and 9,398 tonnes and the hull was subdivided into 92 separate compartments. The ships were fitted with double bottoms and two bilge keels, which were the first of their kind in the Royal Navy and helped to lessen the rolling of the ships in heavy seas. Because of their great length, they had poor manoeuvrability, which was aptly demonstrated when Warrior collided with Royal Oak in 1868. They had a noticeable trimming at the bow, partly due to the iron knee fitted on the bow to improve the ship’s aesthetics. This also disallowed any potential ramming manoeuvres against enemy vessels. Efforts to correct the trim with adjustments made in the 1870s were not particularly successful.
Warrior was a common Royal Navy warship name, in tradition mainly with British practice to name warships after strong adjectives that described great might or power. As for Black Prince, she was named after Edward the Black Prince, the heir of Edward III of England, who died before his father leading to the accession of his son, Richard II instead.
The Warrior-class ships were fitted with a single 2-cylinder trunk steam engine made by John Penn and Sons driving a single 7.50 metre propeller, with ten rectangular boilers providing steam for the engine. The engine was the most powerful ever fitted to a warship at the time and produced between 5,267 and 5,772 indicated horsepower. On sea trials in October 1861, Warrior attained a maximum speed of 14.08 knots, with her sister Black Prince being half a knot slower. The ships carried 810 tonnes of coal, which was enough to steam 2,100 nautical miles at 11.0 knots. They were also equipped with sails, with a sail area of 4,497 m2. The lower masts were of wooden construction, with the other masts made out of iron. Warrior could make 13.0 knots on sail power alone, although her sister could only make 11.0 knots. Under both sail and steam Warrior once made an impressive 17.50 knots between Portsmouth and Plymouth against the tide. The ships were also fitted with the largest hoisting propeller ever made. It weighed over 26 tonnes and took 600 men to raise it onto the ship to reduce drag while under sail.
The ship’s crew consisted of 50 officers and 656 ratings in 1863. The majority of the crew lived in the single gun deck, sleeping in hammocks between the guns, up to 18 men between each pair. The officers slept in the aft of the ship in small individual cabins. The captain had two large and well-furnished cabins. Of the 656 ratings, 122 were Royal Marines. The marines manned the aft section of guns and slept in hammocks between the officers and the crew’s accommodation.
The armament of the Warrior-class ships was changed several times, both in the design stage and during their service lives. The original armament was intended to be 40 x 206mm/15 68pdr 95cwt Smoothbore Muzzleloading Rifles, with 19 on each side of the main deck and one fore and aft as chase guns on the upper deck. During construction, the plan changed, with the new armament including 10 x 183mm/17 110pdr 82cwt Breechloading Guns, with only 26 of the original 206mm guns. In addition to these, there would be 4 x 121mm/21 40pdr 35cwt Breechloading Guns as saluting guns. It was also planned to replace the 121mm 40pdr guns with 70pdrs, but these latter guns failed their tests and were never fitted. Eight of the ten 183mm guns were fitted on the main deck, with the remaining two acting as chase guns, fore and aft. However, despite these changes favouring the 183mm guns, they were found to be inferior to the 206mm in terms of armour penetration during tests conducted in September 1861. There were also incidents of breech explosions during the Shimonoseki Campaign and the Bombardment of Kagoshima between 1863 and 1864 which prevented the Warrior-class ships from being fitted with a full complement of these weapons.
The 206mm/15 68pdr 95cwt Smoothbore Muzzleloading Rifles weighed 4,826.2KG, with the solid shot that it fired weighing in at 30.8KG. The gun had a muzzle velocity of 481 M/S and a a maximum firing range of 2.9 km at an elevation of 12.0 degrees. The 183mm/17 110pdr 82cwt Breechloading Guns weighed 4,165.79KG and fired a shot weighing 48.5-49.9KG. It had a muzzle velocity of 350 M/S and could fire out to a maximum range of 3.7 km at an elevation of 11.25 degrees. The 121mm/21 40pdr 35cwt Breechloading Guns weighed 1,778.0KG and fired a shot weighing 18.1KG. The muzzle velocity was 350 M/S, and its maximum firing range was 3.5KM. Between 1863 and 1864, the 121mm guns were replaced with a heavier version with the same ballistics. All the guns fitted to the ships could fire both solid shot and explosive shells.
During their 1867-1868 refits, both ships were rearmed. Both ships received 4 x 203mm/15 Mark III Muzzleloading Rifles to replace the underwhelming 183mm guns and the 121mm saluting guns were replaced by 4 x 95mm/21 20pdr 15cwt Breechloading Guns. Additionally, the primary 206mm armament of the two ships was replaced by new 178mm/16 Mark III Muzzleloading Rifles. Warrior received 28 of these rifles, whereas Black Prince only received 24. The 203mm/15 Mark III Muzzleloading Rifles weighed 9.1 Tonnes and fired a shell weighing 79.4KG. It had a muzzle velocity of 430 M/S and could penetrate up to 244mm of wrought iron armour. The 178mm/16 Mark III Muzzleloading Rifles weighed 6.6 Tonnes and fired a 50.8KG shell. It had a muzzle velocity of 465 M/S and could penetrate up to 196mm of wrought iron armour. It had a maximum firing range of 5.0 km. The 95mm/21 20pdr 15cwt Breechloading Guns weighed 762.0KG and fired a shell weighing 9.894KG. It could fire the shell at a muzzle velocity of 300 M/S up to a maximum firing range of 3.1 km.
The armour of both ships was identical and consisted of 114mm of wrought iron backed by 457mm teak along the armoured belt. It was made up of 0.91-3.66m plates that interlocked by the tongue and groove method and were directly bolted through the teak to the iron hull. The teak was made up of 229mm layers at right angles, which strengthened the armour by dampening the shockwaves caused by the impact of shells. According to tests conducted at Shoeburyness in October 1861, the armour “was practically invulnerable to the ordnance at the time in use”. The armour covered 64.9 metres of the centre of the ship and extended 4.9 metres above the waterline and 1.8 metres below it. The guns on the main deck were protected by 114mm transverse bulkheads. The ends of the ship were unprotected, although they were subdivided into watertight compartments to minimise flooding. However, the lack of armour at the stern of the vessels left their steering gear and rudder vulnerable.
Warrior and Black Prince had noticeably short service lives. While they were the pinnacle of naval engineering when they were commissioned in 1861 and 1862, respectively, in just a few years, more advanced designs had already come to the fore and by the end of the decade, they were already regarded as obsolete. Neither ship fired their guns in anger, and they spent most of their service lives in reserve, with brief periods on duty in the Channel Fleet in between refits. Both ships received new armament as described earlier in refits conducted in 1867-1868. They were further modified between 1872-1875 with the addition of a poop deck, their boilers were replaced, and a steam capstan was finished. A shorter bowsprit was also fitted. The ship’s poor manoeuvrability was demonstrated in 1868 when Warrior collided with HMS Royal Oak, losing her figurehead and jib boom, and destroying Royal Oak’s cutter. The ship also narrowly avoided colliding with HMS Agincourt when she was following her out of Gibraltar and Agincourt grounded on Pearl Rock. Black Prince had an unfortunate start to her life when she capsized while in the dock at Greenock before she was completed. This delayed her completion to September 1862. Black Prince was briefly the flagship of Rear Admiral Sir John Dalrymple-Hay of the Channel Fleet in 1875, before being placed in reserve again in 1878.
Both ships survived much longer than their military usefulness, with Black Prince being converted into a training ship in 1896, only being sold for scrap in 1923 when she was over 60 years old and just a hulk. As for Warrior, she was hulked as a depot ship in Portsmouth Harbour in 1902 and then she became part of the Royal Navy’s Torpedo School in 1904. She survived beyond the post-WWI years due to being significantly devalued thanks to the excessive quantities of scrap steel flooding the market in the wake of all the scrapping that followed the end of the war and the signing of the Washington Naval Treaty in 1922. She remained a hulk until the late 1970s when she was transferred to Hartlepool to begin a long-awaited and much-discussed restoration project. Work wasn’t finished until 1987 and journeyed to her new berth in Portsmouth Harbour, where she was welcomed by thousands of people. She is now part of the National Historic Fleet and is berthed near HMS Victory and the Mary Rose and remains there as a museum ship visited by hundreds of thousands a year to this day.
CLASS OVERVIEW
Ships In Class | Builder | Laid Down | Launched | Commissioned | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Warrior | Thames Ironworks, Blackwall, London, England | 25th May 1859 | 29th December 1860 | 24th October 1861 | Museum Ship, 1987-Present |
Black Prince | Robert Napier, Govan, Glasgow, Scotland | 12th October 1859 | 27th February 1861 | 12th September 1862 | Sold For Scrapping, 21st February 1923 |
STATISTICS
Warrior-Class (As Built) | |
---|---|
Operators | United Kingdom |
Preceded By | None |
Succeeded By | Defence-Class |
Standard Displacement | 9,284 Tonnes 9,398 Tonnes (Black Prince) |
Full Displacement | N/A |
Length | 128.0 Metres |
Beam | 17.78 Metres |
Draught | 7.92 Metres |
Machinery | Sails, 1 x John Penn and Sons 2-Cylinder Trunk Steam Engine, 10 x Rectangular Boilers, 1 x Shaft |
Power | 5,267 - 5,772 IHP |
Speed | 13.60 - 14.08 Knots |
Range | 2,100 Nautical Miles @ 11.0 Knots (Steam) Unlimited (Sail) |
Complement | 707 |
Armament | 26 x 206mm/15 68pdr 95cwt Smoothbore Muzzleloading Guns [26 x 1], 10 x 183mm/17 110pdr 82cwt Breechloading Guns [10 x 1], 4 x 121mm/21 40pdr 35cwt Breechloading Guns [4 x 1] |
Armour | Armoured Belt: 114mm + 457mm Teak Backing Bulkheads: 114mm |
Modernisations
Warrior-Class (As Modernised) | |
---|---|
Armament | 1867-1868, Both: 4 x 203mm/15 Mark III Muzzleloading Rifles [4 x 1], 4 x 95mm/21 20pdr 15cwt Breechloading Guns [4 x 1] 1867-1868, Warrior: 28 x 178mm/16 Mark III Muzzleloading Rifles [28 x 1] 1867-1868, Black Prince: 24 x 178mm/16 Mark III Muzzleloading Rifles [24 x 1] |
Other Changes | 1863, Both: Funnels Raised By 1.80 Metres To Improve Draught To The Boilers 1872-1875, Both: Poop Deck & Steam Capstan Fitted, Shorter Bowsprit Fitted & All Boilers Replaced |
GALLERY
In order of appearance, left-to-right, top-to-bottom. Only where attribution is required has it been provided:
Hero Image & Warrior-Class Gallery Image #1: By Rennett Stowe from USA – HMS Warrior, CC BY 2.0
Warrior-Class Gallery Image #2: By ianpudsey, CC BY 3.0
Warrior-Class Gallery Image #3: By Thefamouspotato – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0
Warrior-Class Gallery Image #4: By The wub – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0
Warrior-Class Gallery Image #5: By Tony Hisgett from Birmingham, UK – Warrior 6Uploaded by tm, CC BY 2.0
Warrior-Class Gallery Image #6: By Tim Sheerman-Chase – https://www.flickr.com/photos/68932647@N00/52772522339/, CC BY 2.0
Warrior-Class Gallery Image #7: By mattbuck (category) – Own work by mattbuck., CC BY-SA 4.0
Warrior-Class Gallery Image #12: By Michael Gaylard from Horsham, UK – HMS Warrior Bolier Room 2.jpg, CC BY 2.0